Bug#908350: lintian: wrong-path-for-interpreter needs updating to match policy 4.2.1
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.100
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Since policy downgraded the "must" quoted by this tag to a "should",
at least the text of the tag should change. Maybe perl folk have suggestions?
Also, should it still be an error? Are those only for musts?
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.17.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_CA:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils 2.31.1-5
ii bzip2 1.0.6-9
ii diffstat 1.61-1+b1
ii dpkg 1.19.0.5+b1
ii file 1:5.34-2
ii gettext 0.19.8.1-7
ii intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.4
ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.34
ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.63-1
ii libcgi-pm-perl 4.40-1
ii libclass-accessor-perl 0.51-1
ii libclone-perl 0.39-1
ii libdpkg-perl 1.19.0.5
ii libemail-valid-perl 1.202-1
ii libfile-basedir-perl 0.08-1
ii libipc-run-perl 20180523.0-1
ii liblist-moreutils-perl 0.416-1+b3
ii libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1.2.0-12
ii libtext-levenshtein-perl 0.13-1
ii libtimedate-perl 2.3000-2
ii liburi-perl 1.74-1
ii libxml-simple-perl 2.25-1
ii libyaml-libyaml-perl 0.72+repack-1
ii man-db 2.8.4-2
ii patchutils 0.3.4-2
ii perl [libdigest-sha-perl] 5.26.2-7
ii t1utils 1.41-2
ii xz-utils 5.2.2-1.3
Versions of packages lintian recommends:
ii libperlio-gzip-perl 0.19-1+b4
Versions of packages lintian suggests:
ii binutils-multiarch 2.31.1-5
ii dpkg-dev 1.19.0.5
ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.72-3+b2
ii libtext-template-perl 1.53-1
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQGzBAEBCAAdFiEE3VS2dnyDRXKVCQCp8gKXHaSnniwFAluUI7YACgkQ8gKXHaSn
niwsyAv/QcSGVVMJfb3gmbI5RQltVAPuo2InNAKdni91q72bOmfOvY+uoqMywgpk
RMrKOOujC1GAtg2sG+yGHpuglQjyvjZN83iNZa7QZeati+PxWOd8O75/YTs4cRqb
CupaoGCCP0V+vbnFEVHFbSgvrxFa/patETFCQWLTU/NvkuDOlhxFnzqxT4M0WS9x
SKF4RzNjFAhk3+VULZxVlujCBYEVFiUb1y4e/9R99ddLqjX15smlUJHQL36jd7EK
3FOc8yepBB1djQ5FQ7MyBh0EtWnDpeq5Mm5xeqyZOdOcW7pf7QI4QYgqaMZRZ+zb
emNJHDW61h/PyJZoBmrJlrge5Ih3uLA3L6PHyd4j5LDkF6gcjLJ3fZVCgjLciUF9
Kk5QO7af/gEahvpWotiNsUt0pR0cXNNbg8t2KR5Bupc97VhUuw0hkG2gmeh/f88i
bdt2v8MGcZrspC/7qQNdBTu+INC4wQakTLs/IO74MEV5dKBTe9WV0rdOsXzLffpy
oyQ3gBLG
=msH2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: