Bug#890959: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology

To: 890959@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#890959: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology
From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:14:21 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 1519226061.168370.1278456232.53564322@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Reply-to: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>, 890959@bugs.debian.org
References: <[🔎] 20180221050059.GA22559@benfinney.id.au>

tags 890959 + pending
thanks

Dear Ben,

Thanks so much for this. Applied in Git, pending upload:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=4960b883510805450914344df900091874c13528


Best wishes,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology
  - From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>

References:
- Bug#890959: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology
  - From: Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org>

Prev by Date: [lintian] 01/01: Correct inconsistent use of "header" terminology (versus "field", etc.) in descriptions and tag names. (Closes: #890959)
Next by Date: Processed: Re: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology
Previous by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#890959: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology
Next by thread: Processed: Re: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread