Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"

To: Dmitry Bogatov <KAction@debian.org>, 916023@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"
From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 23:35:37 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1544394937.3263682.1603947800.5455FB76@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Reply-to: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>, 916023@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 154436062097.3726.15299056329618976998.reportbug@neophite>
References: <[🔎] 154436062097.3726.15299056329618976998.reportbug@neophite> <[🔎] 154436062097.3726.15299056329618976998.reportbug@neophite>

tags 916023 + moreinfo
thanks

Hi Dmitry,

> please add check, that binary package could have "Architecture: all"
> instead of "any".

Hm, is this not the (experimental):

  https://lintian.debian.org/tags/package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files.html

… tag? :)


Best wishes,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"
  - From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
- Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"
  - From: Dmitry Bogatov <KAction@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"
  - From: Dmitry Bogatov <KAction@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#916087: lintian: "exec failed: Text file busy" when running tests by tag
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"
Previous by thread: Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread