Bug#871956: lintian: false positive: binary-file-built-without-LFS-support on x32
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 15:02:03 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I'd suggest just marking what we have an idea about. It's not
> > like lintian warnings matter for something that's not in the archive...
>
> That's true.
>
> (Implementation braindump for anyone interested in jumping in: we
> could simply blacklist x32 directly in checks/binaries.pm, but we
> have data/common/architectures so we might need to add a field there
> and update Lintian::Architecture. The testsuite will need some
> cleverness so that we don't fail under x32.)
I think this information is somewhat already provided by the dpkg
arch tables. Any architecture with a 64-bit CPU and with a 32-bit
ABI, as defined by the cputable and abitable files.
So this would include x32, arm64ilp32 and the mipsn32* arches.
AFAIR the OpenBSD port on 32-bit CPUs would be affected too as they
did a scorched-earth migration to 64-bit types ignoring any backwards
binary compatibility. But then I guess we can just ignore that one. :)
Thanks,
Guillem
Reply to: