[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#823853: marked as done (lintian: False positive for source-is-missing on misc/farbtastic/farbtastic.js)



Your message dated Mon, 16 May 2016 21:59:51 +0200
with message-id <CAE2SPAa34M7TCeQg=d4Rj_AC_zdt_N9JAwr+3aST8o7Go0MQjA@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#823853: lintian: False positive for source-is-missing on misc/farbtastic/farbtastic.js
has caused the Debian Bug report #823853,
regarding lintian: False positive for source-is-missing on misc/farbtastic/farbtastic.js
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
823853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823853
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.43
Severity: normal

Lintian erroneously identifies misc/farbtastic/farbtastic.js for a
"source-is-missing" message. The file shipped by upstream *is*
minified:

    https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/drupal7.git/tree/misc/farbtastic/farbtastic.js

However, I do ship it in source inside debian/missing-sources:

    https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/drupal7.git/tree/debian/missing-sources/farbtastic/farbtastic.js

I am filing this bug as lintian insists that «If this is a
false-positive, please report a bug against Lintian.»

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils                          2.26-8
ii  bzip2                             1.0.6-8
ii  diffstat                          1.61-1
ii  file                              1:5.25-2
ii  gettext                           0.19.7-2
ii  hardening-includes                2.8+nmu2
ii  intltool-debian                   0.35.0+20060710.4
ii  libapt-pkg-perl                   0.1.29+b5
ii  libarchive-zip-perl               1.57-1
ii  libclass-accessor-perl            0.34-1
ii  libclone-perl                     0.38-1+b1
ii  libdata-alias-perl                1.20-1+b1
ii  libdpkg-perl                      1.18.4
ii  libemail-valid-perl               1.198-1
ii  libfile-basedir-perl              0.07-1
ii  libipc-run-perl                   0.94-1
ii  liblist-moreutils-perl            0.413-1+b1
ii  libparse-debianchangelog-perl     1.2.0-8
ii  libperl5.22 [libdigest-sha-perl]  5.22.1-10
ii  libtext-levenshtein-perl          0.13-1
ii  libtimedate-perl                  2.3000-2
ii  liburi-perl                       1.71-1
ii  libyaml-libyaml-perl              0.41-6+b1
ii  man-db                            2.7.5-1
ii  patchutils                        0.3.4-1
ii  perl                              5.22.1-10
ii  t1utils                           1.39-2
ii  xz-utils                          5.1.1alpha+20120614-2.1

Versions of packages lintian recommends:
ii  dpkg                                 1.18.4
ii  libperlio-gzip-perl                  0.19-1+b1
ii  perl                                 5.22.1-10
ii  perl-modules-5.22 [libautodie-perl]  5.22.1-10

Versions of packages lintian suggests:
ii  binutils-multiarch     2.26-8
ii  dpkg-dev               1.18.4
ii  libhtml-parser-perl    3.72-1
pn  libtext-template-perl  <none>

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org> wrote:
> Jakub Wilk dijo [Mon, May 09, 2016 at 09:16:43PM +0200]:
>> >Oh, right!
>> >
>> >Fixed it in the repository;
>>
>> Shall we close this bug?
>
> It can be closed. It could also be made into a more general "be less
> picky" wishlist. Your call :)

Closed than

--- End Message ---

Reply to: