Bug#767754: [lintian] new check: file-in-root-and-usr
Guillem a gentle remainder
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES
<roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guillem could you get a glimspe a this bug?
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> wrote:
>> On Aug 05, Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> And this link should removed a deinstall time and you do not give
>>> example for migration and check for dpkg-divert ... So your
>>> description is not complete... Could you give exact script snippet to
>>> use ? Better could you in parallel create a
>>> dpkg-maintscript-helper in order to avoid common error ? The
>> Do you really think that this is needed, considering that I have already
>> opened bugs with patches for all the affected packages?
>> (Only zsh uses dpkg-divert, and I do not know how to handle this case.)
>
> Yes I think it is needed, but maybe guillem come with another ideas.
> Do you have an usertag for tracking bug you have already openned ?
>
> For dpkg-divert I do not know how to handle I could be different
> depending the cases.
>
>>> Moreover for library why do we need to create the symlink ? I think
>>> one library shadow another and is still a bug. In this case you should
>>> duplicate the tag and create a new tag for library.
>> I do not understand your comment.
>
> I means that binaries under s?bin and libraries are different beast. I
> think the solution for library is to not use symlink (and delete one
> of copy) because LD_PATH is always used whereas for bin you could call
> it directly.
>
> Maybe I commit some mistake
>
> Bastien
>
>> --
>> ciao,
>> Marco
Reply to: