Bug#767754: [lintian] new check: file-in-root-and-usr
Guillem could you get a glimspe a this bug?
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> wrote:
> On Aug 05, Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And this link should removed a deinstall time and you do not give
>> example for migration and check for dpkg-divert ... So your
>> description is not complete... Could you give exact script snippet to
>> use ? Better could you in parallel create a
>> dpkg-maintscript-helper in order to avoid common error ? The
> Do you really think that this is needed, considering that I have already
> opened bugs with patches for all the affected packages?
> (Only zsh uses dpkg-divert, and I do not know how to handle this case.)
Yes I think it is needed, but maybe guillem come with another ideas.
Do you have an usertag for tracking bug you have already openned ?
For dpkg-divert I do not know how to handle I could be different
depending the cases.
>> Moreover for library why do we need to create the symlink ? I think
>> one library shadow another and is still a bug. In this case you should
>> duplicate the tag and create a new tag for library.
> I do not understand your comment.
I means that binaries under s?bin and libraries are different beast. I
think the solution for library is to not use symlink (and delete one
of copy) because LD_PATH is always used whereas for bin you could call
it directly.
Maybe I commit some mistake
Bastien
> --
> ciao,
> Marco
Reply to: