[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#760634: marked as done (lintian: add xfce4-dev-tools / xdt-autogen for updating config.{guess,sub})



Your message dated Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:08:24 +0200
with message-id <54171D08.1080402@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#760634: lintian: add xfce4-dev-tools / xdt-autogen for updating config.{guess, sub}
has caused the Debian Bug report #760634,
regarding lintian: add xfce4-dev-tools / xdt-autogen for updating config.{guess,sub}
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
760634: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760634
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.25
Severity: wishlist
Owner: pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Hi,

lintian has checks for “correct” dates of config.{guess,sub} in the
source package, especially for support for newer architectures.

I didn't check but I guess it drops the warning in case debian/rules use
autoreconf command or dh applet, since then the files will be updated at
build time.

Can xdt-autogen (from xfce4-dev-tools package) be added to the list of commands
dropping the warning? The command does the job of updating autotools
files (plus some Xfce specific stuff).

Thanks in advance,
-- 
Yves-Alexis Perez

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (450, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils                       2.24.51.20140903-1
ii  bzip2                          1.0.6-7
ii  diffstat                       1.58-1
ii  file                           1:5.19-1
ii  gettext                        0.19.2-2
ii  hardening-includes             2.5+nmu1
ii  intltool-debian                0.35.0+20060710.1
ii  libapt-pkg-perl                0.1.29+b2
ii  libarchive-zip-perl            1.38-1
ii  libclass-accessor-perl         0.34-1
ii  libclone-perl                  0.37-1+b1
ii  libdpkg-perl                   1.17.13
ii  libemail-valid-perl            1.194-1
ii  libfile-basedir-perl           0.03-1
ii  libipc-run-perl                0.92-1
ii  liblist-moreutils-perl         0.33-2+b1
ii  libparse-debianchangelog-perl  1.2.0-1
ii  libtext-levenshtein-perl       0.09-1
ii  libtimedate-perl               2.3000-2
ii  liburi-perl                    1.64-1
ii  man-db                         2.6.7.1-1
ii  patchutils                     0.3.3-1
ii  perl [libdigest-sha-perl]      5.20.0-6
ii  t1utils                        1.37-2.1

Versions of packages lintian recommends:
ii  libautodie-perl                 2.25-1
ii  libperlio-gzip-perl             0.18-3+b1
ii  perl-modules [libautodie-perl]  5.20.0-6

Versions of packages lintian suggests:
ii  binutils-multiarch     2.24.51.20140903-1
ii  dpkg-dev               1.17.13
ii  libhtml-parser-perl    3.71-1+b2
ii  libtext-template-perl  1.46-1
ii  libyaml-perl           1.09-1
ii  xz-utils               5.1.1alpha+20120614-2

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2014-09-15 13:09, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> [...]
> 
> Actuall, I think you were right and the point is somehow moot.
> xfce4-dev-tools doesn't only contains xdt-autogen, it can be used in
> situations where automake is actually not needed at all. So depending on
> it might not be the best idea, but if one needs xfce4-dev-tools for
> xdt-autogen, then I guess she should make sure automake is installed,
> and thus add the dependency on the Build-depends line (even if it it's
> usually brought by something else).
> 
> I guess you can safely close the bug (I don't think we have an invalid
> tag).
> 
> Regards,
> 

Noted, I will close the bug accordingly. Thanks, :)

~Niels

--- End Message ---

Reply to: