[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#642908: marked as done (lintian: Add P: or X: check to recommend DEP 5 for debian/copyright)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:26:31 +0200
with message-id <51ED24F7.6000805@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#642908: lintian: Add P: or X: check to recommend DEP 5 for debian/copyright
has caused the Debian Bug report #642908,
regarding lintian: Add P: or X: check to recommend DEP 5 for debian/copyright
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
642908: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642908
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.3
Severity: wishlist

Please add a check to recommend update old debian/copyright to DEP 5
format.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2011-10-11 18:35, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2011-09-26 00:32, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net> writes:
>>
>>> Please add a check to recommend update old debian/copyright to DEP 5
>>> format.
>>
>> I don't think this is appropriate, at least at this time.  Some parts of
>> Debian really like the format, but other maintainers really don't, and
>> Lintian tries not to take a stance (even at the pedantic level) on issues
>> of ongoing controversy.
>>
> 
> Personally, I agree with this and this is also why I have not looked at
> fixing #612610.
> 
>> I think it would be appropriate to add such a check in the profiles of
>> specific packaging teams who want to use DEP-5 on all of their packages,
>> but not centrally in Lintian's default profiles.
>>
> 
> Maybe we should block this (and #612610) on #359059?
> 
> ~Niels
> 

Hi,

I am closing this now, as Lintian is not going to take a stance on this.
 However, you can now write your own lintian checks[1], so it is
possible to write checks for this (for personal use or otherwise).

~Niels

[1] http://lintian.debian.org/manual/section-3.3.html

--- End Message ---
Reply to: