Re: [RFR] Bits draft for Lintian 2.5.12

[Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>]

* Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>, 2013-04-16, 22:06:
> API stability not included, so packages should add dependencies on 
> Lintian accordingly.

Well, adding dependencies would be required even if we guaranteed API 
stability. :) Perhaps "dependencies" misses an adjective such as 
"strict" or "tight"?

Anyway, how strict the dependency should be?
Is
	lintian (>= 2.5.12), lintian (<< 2.5.13)
enough, or should I use:
	lintian (>= 2.5.12), lintian (<< 2.5.12+)
?

> * Reduce the constant overhead in invocating Lintian's collections.

Typo: invocating -> invoking.

--
Jakub Wilk