Bug#622801: marked as done (lintian: issue in desktop-command-not-in-package check?)
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2011 22:23:44 +0200
with message-id <4DA757D0.1000008@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#622801: lintian: issue in desktop-command-not-in-package check?
has caused the Debian Bug report #622801,
regarding lintian: issue in desktop-command-not-in-package check?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
622801: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622801
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.0~rc2
Severity: normal
Hey,
it seems that the desktop-command-not-in-package tag has an issue with
how the path is handled.
I have an override set in evolution:
evolution-common: desktop-command-not-in-package /usr/share/applications/evolution.desktop evolution
evolution-common: desktop-command-not-in-package /usr/share/applications/evolution-settings.desktop evolution-settings
but running lintian on it gives:
corsac@hidalgo: lintian evolution_2.32.2-3_amd64.changes
W: evolution source: newer-standards-version 3.9.2 (current is 3.9.1)
W: evolution-common: desktop-command-not-in-package usr/share/applications/evolution-settings.desktop evolution-settings
W: evolution-common: desktop-command-not-in-package usr/share/applications/evolution.desktop evolution
W: evolution: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/evolution-settings
The two desktop-command-not-in-package shouldn't be displayed since they
should be overriden, but the command lacks the initial slash.
Is it a regression in lintian or should all the overrides be updated?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils 2.21.0.20110327-3 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii diffstat 1.54-1 produces graph of changes introduc
ii dpkg-dev 1.16.0.1 Debian package development tools
ii file 5.04-5 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gettext 0.18.1.1-3 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.1 Help i18n of RFC822 compliant conf
ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.24+b1 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii libclass-accessor-perl 0.34-1 Perl module that automatically gen
ii libemail-valid-perl 0.184-1 Perl module for checking the valid
ii libipc-run-perl 0.89-1 Perl module for running processes
ii libparse-debianchangel 1.2.0-1 parse Debian changelogs and output
ii libtimedate-perl 1.2000-1 collection of modules to manipulat
ii liburi-perl 1.58-1 module to manipulate and access UR
ii locales 2.11.2-13 Embedded GNU C Library: National L
ii man-db 2.6.0.2-1 on-line manual pager
ii perl [libdigest-sha-pe 5.10.1-19 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
lintian recommends no packages.
Versions of packages lintian suggests:
ii binutils-multiarch 2.21.0.20110327-3 Binary utilities that support mult
ii libtext-template-perl 1.45-2 Text::Template perl module
ii man-db 2.6.0.2-1 on-line manual pager
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-04-14 20:41, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.5.0~rc2
> Severity: normal
>
> Hey,
>
> [...]
>
> The two desktop-command-not-in-package shouldn't be displayed since they
> should be overriden, but the command lacks the initial slash.
>
> Is it a regression in lintian or should all the overrides be updated?
>
> Regards,
Hi
That is very much intentional (as I may have mentioned over IRC before I
lost connection). Please see the 2.5.0~rc1 entry in the changelog,
#534940 or the d-d-a email[1] for more details on the change of file
prefixes.
Should you discover that Lintian still uses a "./" or a "/" prefix for
a file name, please file a bug against Lintian.
~Niels
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/02/msg00009.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=3quM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: