Re: lintian_2.4.0_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Russ Allbery wrote:
> I ended up being sick last weekend and
> then worked 55 hours this week, culminating in having to roll back an
> upgrade because unexpected things broke. :/ So it's been a hell of a
> week. (Oh, and my excellent former boss just got laid off. Sigh.)
I'm sorry to hear that. I hope everything is going to be fine.
> I'm going on vacation Friday for a little more than a week, and I expect
> I'll disappear for the beginning of that and then have a lot more free
> time to work on fun things like Lintian towards the end of it.
Ok, no problem. Enjoy your holidays! :)
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>> [1] Adam and I briefly discussed it again on IRC and the conclusion was
>> that we should probably switch to something else other than du(1). Even
>> with -- apparent-size we didn't get to make the test indicate /usr/share
>> occupied 100% of the total package size (ignoring the size output.)
>
> I wonder if we should just add the sizes in the tar listing.
>
That might be an option, yes. It doesn't report the correct sizes either,
but... meh, it should at least be consistent.
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
Reply to: