[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#548805: marked as done (lintian: Packages using update-inetd must depend on inet-superserver)



Your message dated Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:02:22 +0200
with message-id <20090929210222.GA3172@mobee>
and subject line Re: Bug#548805: lintian: Packages using update-inetd must depend on inet-superserver
has caused the Debian Bug report #548805,
regarding lintian: Packages using update-inetd must depend on inet-superserver
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
548805: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548805
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.17
Severity: normal

Hi,

The tag maintainer-script-needs-depends-on-update-inetd recommends to depend
on either inet-superserver or update-inetd, when it fact the later is
redundant (a dependency on inet-superserver indirectly satisfies the
update-inetd dependency)

And of course the tag would have to be renamed to
maintainer-script-needs-depends-on-inet-superserver

Number of packages affected:

$ cat /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.be.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-i386_Packages
| grep-dctrl -F Depends update-inetd -a --not -F Provides inet-superserver -s
Package  | wc -l
41

Cheers,
Serafeim

-- 
debtags-organised WNPP bugs: http://members.hellug.gr/serzan/wnpp



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 04:37:22PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote [edited]:
> I don't understand this problem report.  The recommendation is to depend
> on one or the other, since some packages don't require inetd be running,
> only that update-inetd be available for postinst to use.

Please ignore -- I completely missed that deamons may be configurable to run
via inetd or standalone (this report would make sense for deamons that can run
only via inetd). Apologies for the noise :-/

-- 
debtags-organised WNPP bugs: http://members.hellug.gr/serzan/wnpp


--- End Message ---

Reply to: