Bug#512265: retitle 512265 to [checks/rules] warn if a test suite exists but is not run
Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com> writes:
> Actually, I'm not sure if checks/rules is the best place for it, as it
> needs information that would make it part of checks/cruft, but doesn't
> completely fit in there either. Maybe some sort of checks/testsuite? I
> don't feel totally comfortable with that option either as I can't think
> about many other checks that could be applied to the package's test
> suite.
Maybe we should introduce checks/build for all checks that try to analyze
the upstream build system? A fix for #472219 would fit in there as well,
and if we wanted to, we could move the config.guess/config.sub/libtool
stuff to that check as well. It only sort of belongs in cruft; it's
different than what the rest of that check does.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: