[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#533571: [checks/init.d] multiple corrections and enhancements



Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.10
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

Hi,

I planned to send all my init.d-related changes together, but since I'm going 
to have a very busy weekend I might not finish the other checks I planned.
So, here it is what I've done so far:

commit 26c1bc2a690cbed63b2d31117141e3275df5d169
Author: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Jun 17 08:29:26 2009 -0500

    Check for init scripts not testing before sourcing /etc/default files

    Init scripts not making sure the /etc/default file exists are very likely
    to break in the event the administrator deletes one or more files, which 
is
    allowed by policy.

commit e61537249dd53ef7195943bd84bad0ee416687e7
Author: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue Jun 16 15:07:40 2009 -0500

    Don't treat /etc/init.d/README as an init script

commit 944679215a631861d0a099c9db4d5623d7bbaf5c
Author: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue Jun 16 14:44:50 2009 -0500

    Fix a bug where init scripts not being registered were not checked

    Some packages do not register their init scripts on the maintainer
    scripts, leading to lintian completely ignoring them when performing
    other checks.

commit f9e8c4cd363e37d9754bf6c610996288b2f75aee
Author: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun Jun 14 21:12:19 2009 -0500

    Check for init scripts with a /usr shebang

commit 39486536877fe1a095936309708da790d07b5d7a
Author: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun Jun 14 19:57:25 2009 -0500

    Fix a bug when looking for required init.d options in comments

    The regular expression in use was not correctly dealing with comments,
    which could result in many false negatives wheen finding the required
    option keyword in a comment.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net

Attachment: lintian_initd.mbox
Description: application/mbox


Reply to: