Re: [SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.2.9-52-g288a108
Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> I could fix runtests so that:
>
> t/runtests t/scTAB/iTAB
>
> would do the right thing, I bet, which would be about as good. I'll
> ponder. :)
Sounds interesting indeed :)
> Moving more of the infrastructure for doing interesting
> things out of debian/rules and into t/runtests is probably a good idea
> anyway.
That'd be great. Something that should probably be done soon is to avoid the
lab setup test from being run every single time test/runtests is executed;
it is useless when one only wants to run a specific test.
Some other changes could include:
* Run t/runtests before test/runtests
* Make t/runtests run the t/scripts tests first
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
Reply to:
- References:
- [SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.2.9-52-g288a108
- From: "Russ Allbery" <rra@debian.org>
- Re: [SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.2.9-52-g288a108
- From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: [SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.2.9-52-g288a108
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: [SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.2.9-52-g288a108
- From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: [SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.2.9-52-g288a108
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>