[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 1.24.4-100-ge2bb37e



The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit e2bb37effab34ef9e035d4b1da4e3b8bf0a70918
Author: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date:   Wed Sep 3 23:07:58 2008 +0100

    reporting/html_reports: Add Severity/Certainty to the description of the package hashes

diff --git a/reporting/html_reports b/reporting/html_reports
index f548317..04fe654 100755
--- a/reporting/html_reports
+++ b/reporting/html_reports
@@ -151,8 +151,9 @@ my %statistics;
 # %by_maint holds a hash of maintainer names to packages and tags.  Each
 # maintainer is a key.  The value is a hash of package names to hashes.  Each
 # package hash is in turn a hash of versions to an anonymous array of hashes,
-# with each hash having keys code, package, type, tag, extra, and xref.  xref
-# gets the partial URL of the maintainer page for that source package.
+# with each hash having keys code, package, type, tag, severity, certainty,
+# extra, and xref.  xref gets the partial URL of the maintainer page for that
+# source package.
 #
 # In other words, the lintian output line:
 #
@@ -163,12 +164,14 @@ my %statistics;
 #
 # { 'gnubg' => {
 #       '0.15~20061120-1' => [
-#           { code    => 'W',
-#             package => 'gnubg',
-#             type    => 'source',
-#             tag     => 'substvar-source-version-is-deprecated',
-#             extra   => 'gnubg-data'
-#             xref    => 'rra@debian.org.html#gnubg' } ] } }
+#           { code      => 'W',
+#             package   => 'gnubg',
+#             type      => 'source',
+#             tag       => 'substvar-source-version-is-deprecated',
+#             severity  => 'normal',
+#             certainty => 'certain',
+#             extra     => 'gnubg-data'
+#             xref      => 'rra@debian.org.html#gnubg' } ] } }
 #
 # and then stored under the key 'Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>'
 #

-- 
Debian package checker


Reply to: