Re: GSoC status: final summary and comments
Jordà Polo <jorda@ettin.org> writes:
> Other than that, there are still a few things, such as the Source/Ref
> field, that could benefit from more discussion here in the list. If the
> classification for tags without Ref[4] is to be used, how should it
> compare to tags with Ref? Treat keywords as if they were "manuals"?
That at least was what I had in the back of my mind.
> Also, how do you think --tags should interact with other options such as
> --display-level? If it makes sense to use both options at the same time,
> what should be the behaviour, display tags as an AND of all options? Or
> does an OR make more sense?
I agree with Frank here. AND makes the most sense to me.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: