Re: new set of changes
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> I'm still not sure the reference is needed. I suspect that as a
> maintainer presented with the tag I'd assume that uscan(1) contained
> information on why my watch file shouldn't contain the version number it
> does. Others' mileages may vary, of course.
Well, if that's the case then feel free to remove it :)
>
> Adam
>
> Adam
Cheers,
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Reply to: