Bug#509286: dh-make-php can be in build-depends (build-depends-without-arch-dep dh-make-php)
Package: lintian
Version: 2.1.2
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
While executing lintian on a PHP PEAR package (php-kolab-*, see
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-kolab/kolab-freebusy/trunk/?rev=0&sc=0),
I got the following info:
I: php-kolab-filter source: build-depends-without-arch-dep dh-make-php
Currently, /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/pear.mk doesn't have a clean::
target. But it may happen, I think.
Two possible solutions here:
- if php-kolab-filter should really go in build-depends-indep, then
/usr/share/dh-make-php/pear.template/control from dh-make-php should
be corrected (I've cc-ed dh-make-php maintainers)
- else, dh-make-php should be added in exceptions of lintian
Regards
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-xen-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii diffstat 1.45-2 produces graph of changes introduc
ii dpkg-dev 1.14.23 Debian package development tools
ii file 4.26-1 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gettext 0.17-4 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.1 Help i18n of RFC822 compliant conf
ii libipc-run-perl 0.80-2 Perl module for running processes
ii libparse-debianchan 1.1.1-2 parse Debian changelogs and output
ii libtimedate-perl 1.1600-9 Time and date functions for Perl
ii liburi-perl 1.35.dfsg.1-1 Manipulates and accesses URI strin
ii man-db 2.5.2-3 on-line manual pager
ii perl [libdigest-sha 5.10.0-18 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
lintian recommends no packages.
Versions of packages lintian suggests:
pn binutils-multiarch <none> (no description available)
ii libtext-template-perl 1.44-1.2 Text::Template perl module
ii man-db 2.5.2-3 on-line manual pager
-- no debconf information
Reply to: