Re: lintian.debian.org -> git
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 04:20:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 15:57 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 01:55:28PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > One thing I noticed is that the results for
> > > apparently-corrupted-elf-binary displayed on lintian.d.o still include
> > > packages shipping 64-bit libraries on i386.
> > >
> > > I've installed lintian 1.24.3 on an i386 etch system and checking the
> > > i386 package of fakeroot 1.9.6 does not raise
> > > any apparently-corrupted-elf-binary tags but does correctly issue
> > > shlib-with-executable-bit for the lib64 binaries, so I'm not sure why
> > > it's not working on gluck.
> >
> > Makes it any difference if you have binutils-multiarch installed or not?
> > (just wild guessing...)
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, but unfortunately not; binutils-multiarch
> wasn't installed initially and after installing it the results are still
> correct.
>
> The only other thing I can think of at the moment is that the version
> check I guarded the readelf fallback code with isn't working on gluck
> for some reason - i.e. "dpkg-query -W -f='${Version}\n' binutils" isn't
> returning a string starting "2.17".
D'oh, all my fault. While I did do a full lintian run, I did not
instruct it to remove the laboratory. So your improvements in the
collection script didn't actually get used...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: