--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 1.24.2
Severity: normal
W: libapache2-mod-python source: build-depends-on-1-revision
build-depends: apache2-threaded-dev (>= 2.2.3-1)
While itis common to start packages / new verisons with a revision of
-1, there're also enough examples of the usage of -0 or similar
constructs.
According to policy this is fine, too, so lintian should not complain
here. I'd suggest change the warning into informational output, as it
indeed happends that there're are build-deps containing an unnecessary
revision.
Cheers,
Bernd
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-think (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii diffstat 1.45-2 produces graph of changes introduc
ii dpkg-dev 1.14.20 Debian package development tools
ii file 4.24-4 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gettext 0.17-3 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.1 Help i18n of RFC822 compliant conf
ii libdigest-sha-perl 5.47-1 Perl extension for SHA-1/224/256/3
ii libparse-debianchan 1.1.1-2 parse Debian changelogs and output
ii libtimedate-perl 1.1600-9 Time and date functions for Perl
ii liburi-perl 1.35.dfsg.1-1 Manipulates and accesses URI strin
ii man-db 2.5.2-1 on-line manual pager
ii perl [libdigest-sha 5.10.0-11.1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
lintian recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 20:21 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > I suppose we could add an exception for apache2-threaded-dev, but it
> > doesn't really seem worth it. This check has been very useful for making
> > backports easier and it's rare that it's wrong to drop the -1 in the
> > version number.
>
> Hmm ok, so I think the best is to override the warning and be happy with
> that.
I'm assuming there's therefore nothing to be done here from lintian's
point of view, so am closing the bug. Please feel free to re-open if I
missed something.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---