Re: Detailed report missing if maintainer has no lintian warning in their package(s)

To: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
Cc: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>, lintian-maint@debian.org
Subject: Re: Detailed report missing if maintainer has no lintian warning in their package(s)
From: Kartik Mistry <kartik.mistry@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 21:59:33 +0530
Message-id: <[🔎] 200805292207.52902.kartik.mistry@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080529151100.GW23774@mail-vs.djpig.de>
References: <[🔎] 200805271520.27219.kartik.mistry@gmail.com> <[🔎] 200805291926.10673.kartik.mistry@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20080529151100.GW23774@mail-vs.djpig.de>

On Thursday 29 May 2008 8:41:00 pm Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > Yeah, but the empty maintainer page has no link to the full page,
> > > which should be changed.
> >
> > Yes. That was my point actually :)
>
> Fixed.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Kartik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to:

References:
- Detailed report missing if maintainer has no lintian warning in their package(s)
  - From: Kartik Mistry <kartik.mistry@gmail.com>
- Re: Detailed report missing if maintainer has no lintian warning in their package(s)
  - From: Kartik Mistry <kartik.mistry@gmail.com>
- Re: Detailed report missing if maintainer has no lintian warning in their package(s)
  - From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>

Prev by Date: lintian: r1325 - in trunk: debian reporting/templates
Next by Date: Re: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() and bashisms update
Previous by thread: Re: Detailed report missing if maintainer has no lintian warning in their package(s)
Next by thread: PERSONAL ASSISTANT NEEDED.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread