Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 01:23:15 -0700 with message-id <873bfw4wp8.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> and subject line lintian: empty (transition) packages shouldn't need a copyright file has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Cc: <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: lintian: empty (transition) packages shouldn't need a copyright file
- From: Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:56:26 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0106181451410.19598-100000@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
Package: lintian Severity: normal Hi, lintian complains about empty packages not having a copyright file. I think it should silently accept empty packages (Severity set to normal because it might actually stop packages from being installed). Simon -- GPG public key available from http://phobos.fs.tum.de/pgp/Simon.Richter.asc Fingerprint: DC26 EB8D 1F35 4F44 2934 7583 DBB6 F98D 9198 3292 Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread! ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:40:22 +0100 From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk> Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Empty package On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:46:20PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote: > Thanks, Julian. This works like a charm, but Lintian has the > following objections: > > E: dict-web1913: no-copyright-file > W: dict-web1913: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link > W: dict-web1913: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link > > Will the Lintian error prevent it from being installed? Shouldn't do; there is no content there to need a copyright. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 101325-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: lintian: empty (transition) packages shouldn't need a copyright file
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 01:23:15 -0700
- Message-id: <873bfw4wp8.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de> writes: > lintian complains about empty packages not having a copyright file. I > think it should silently accept empty packages (Severity set to normal > because it might actually stop packages from being installed). Policy 12.5 explicitly requires all Debian packages to install a copyright file or a symlink to the copyright file provided by another package. No exceptions are made for empty packages. Given that, I don't believe this bug is valid and am closing it. -- Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--- End Message ---