[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#311471: marked as done (lintian: Please support the ppc64 architecture)



Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:32:27 -0400
with message-id <E1Drdn9-00011I-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#311471: fixed in lintian 1.23.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2005 07:41:01 +0000
>From aj@andaco.de Wed Jun 01 00:41:01 2005
Return-path: <aj@andaco.de>
Received: from c214240.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.214.240] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DdNqX-0004D6-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:41:01 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DdNqN-00013T-FB; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:40:51 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
From: Andreas Jochens <aj@andaco.de>
Subject: lintian: Please support the ppc64 architecture
Message-Id: <E1DdNqN-00013T-FB@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:40:51 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Please add support for the ppc64 architecture in 'checks/common_data.pm'
and 'checks/fields.desc'.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/lintian-1.23.8/checks/common_data.pm ./checks/common_data.pm
--- ../tmp-orig/lintian-1.23.8/checks/common_data.pm	2005-01-14 18:19:55.000000000 +0100
+++ ./checks/common_data.pm	2005-06-01 09:23:08.305184986 +0200
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
 
 %known_archs = map { $_ => 1 }
     ('alpha', 'amd64', 'arm', 'hppa', 'hurd-i386', 'i386', 'ia64', 'mips',
-	 'mipsel', 'm68k', 'powerpc', 's390', 'sh', 'sparc', 'any', 'all');
+	 'mipsel', 'm68k', 'powerpc', 'ppc64', 's390', 'sh', 'sparc',
+	 'any', 'all');
 
 %known_sections = map { $_ => 1 }
     ('admin', 'base', 'comm', 'devel', 'doc', 'editors', 'electronics',
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/lintian-1.23.8/checks/fields.desc ./checks/fields.desc
--- ../tmp-orig/lintian-1.23.8/checks/fields.desc	2004-12-26 00:40:20.000000000 +0100
+++ ./checks/fields.desc	2005-06-01 09:23:36.322358422 +0200
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
 Type: warning
 Info: In addition to the special values `all' and `any', the architecture
  names alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel,
- powerpc, s390, sh, and sparc are currently in use.  The special value
+ powerpc, ppc64, s390, sh, and sparc are currently in use.  The special value
  `source' is only used in .changes files and does not make sense in a binary
  package or a .dsc file.
 

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 311471-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jul 2005 15:42:40 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Sun Jul 10 08:42:40 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Drdx2-0000L5-00; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 08:42:40 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Drdn9-00011I-00; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:32:27 -0400
From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@debian.org>
To: 311471-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#311471: fixed in lintian 1.23.10
Message-Id: <E1Drdn9-00011I-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:32:27 -0400
Delivered-To: 311471-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9

Source: lintian
Source-Version: 1.23.10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lintian, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lintian_1.23.10.dsc
  to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.10.dsc
lintian_1.23.10.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.10.tar.gz
lintian_1.23.10_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.10_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 311471@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@debian.org> (supplier of updated lintian package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:20:42 +0200
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.23.10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers <lintian-maint@debian.org>
Changed-By: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@debian.org>
Description: 
 lintian    - Debian package checker
Closes: 88340 253405 294894 295093 299792 307639 308569 309203 309220 311471 317049
Changes: 
 lintian (1.23.10) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * The "Ah, it's LinuxTag and I still have free time!" release
 .
   * debian/control:
     + [HE] Updated description to say that we're calibrated for Policy
       version 3.6.2. As the changes between 3.6.{1,2} aren't stuff we
       (can) check, this is actually true! (Closes: #317049)
 .
   * testset/runtests:
     + [HE] Fix symlinking of original tarballs to allow run directories
       outside the lintian source tree.
 .
   * checks/control-file
     + [HE] Check for duplicated fields. (Closes: #299792)
 .
   * checks/fields:
     + [HE] Change unknown-architecture a bit: We don't complain about
       "known" non-standard archs (like amd64, ppc64, *bsd-i386) and only
       print out an info message for those. (Closes: #253405, #311471)
 .
   * checks/files:
     + [HE] Allow backupninja configuration files in /etc/backup.d/ to be
       0600. (Closes: #307639)
 .
   * checks/scripts:
     + [HE] Allow Scripts in /etc/Xsession.d/ to be not executable, as they're
       not directly called, but only sourced. (Closes: #309203)
     + [HE] Check for use of adduser and update-inetd and warn if the package
       has no (pre-)dependency on adduser/netbase. Patch by Russ Allbery,
       thanks for the work. (Closes: #308569)
     + [HE] Check for use of "." as a deprecated separator between user and
       group names in chown call. (Closes: #88340)
     + [HE] Fix to work $interpreter-script-but-no-$pkg-dep with more than one
       dependency if needed. First use case is depending on build-essential
       to provide /usr/bin/make. (Closes: #294894)
     + [HE] Add lefty as a valid interpreter and check for a correct dependency
       on graphviz. (Closes: #295093)
 .
   * checks/shared-libs:
     + [HE] Don't allow non-PIC shared libraries. This conforms to the new
       etch release policy. Thanks for the report and patch to Kurt Roeckx
       <kurt@roeckx.be>. (Closes: #309220)
Files: 
 8f474879521b2c86c26f8f8e781a45cb 780 devel optional lintian_1.23.10.dsc
 3d9a59329a9d11dde13b3cb861426c9f 257919 devel optional lintian_1.23.10.tar.gz
 24609039d9928f3bfe669ae726e7762b 226022 devel optional lintian_1.23.10_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkLROX0ACgkQmO5zOp3h7rHeNQCfTlc4MqCLmaGk/266WDfC+Pwv
1IEAn1Pup/ADIiIeghQYeMe+LKtNpufg
=VVoz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: