Re: recognising ruby1.8
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 12:29:30AM +0100, Dafydd Harries wrote:
>
> Lintian warns about "#!/usr/bin/ruby1.8" being an unusual interpreter.
> Attached is a patch for Lintian that fixes that.
Fixed in SVN. I extended your patch a bit. Attached the full patch
for reference.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Index: checks/scripts
===================================================================
--- checks/scripts (revision 285)
+++ checks/scripts (revision 286)
@@ -77,6 +77,8 @@
'runhugs98' => '/usr/bin/runhugs98',
'runhugs' => '/usr/bin/runhugs',
'ruby' => '/usr/bin/ruby',
+ 'ruby1.6' => '/usr/bin/ruby1.6',
+ 'ruby1.8' => '/usr/bin/ruby1.8',
'scsh' => '/usr/bin/scsh',
'sed' => '/bin/sed',
'sh' => '/bin/sh',
@@ -121,7 +123,6 @@
'rc' => 'rc',
'regina' => 'regina-rexx',
'rexx' => 'regina-rexx',
- 'ruby' => 'ruby',
'runhugs1.4' => 'hugs',
'runhugs98' => 'hugs98',
'scsh' => 'scsh',
@@ -241,6 +242,10 @@
my $ver = $1 ? $1 : "";
tag_error("python-script-but-no-python-dep", $filename)
unless ($deps{"python$ver"});
+ } elsif ($base =~ /^ruby(\d.\d)?$/) {
+ my $ver = $1 ? $1 : "";
+ tag_error("ruby-script-but-no-ruby-dep", $filename)
+ unless ($deps{"ruby$ver"});
} elsif ($base eq 'pike') {
tag_error("pike-script-but-no-pike-dep", $filename)
unless ($deps{'pike'} or $deps{'pike7'});
Index: checks/scripts.desc
===================================================================
--- checks/scripts.desc (revision 285)
+++ checks/scripts.desc (revision 286)
@@ -333,6 +333,19 @@
In some cases a weaker relationship, such as Suggests or Recommends, will
be more appropriate.
+Tag: ruby-script-but-no-ruby-dep
+Type: error
+Info: Packages with scripts that are executed with ruby must depend on the
+ package ruby. Those that have scripts executed with a versioned ruby
+ package need a dependency on the equivalent version of ruby.
+ .
+ For example, if a script in the package uses #!/usr/bin/ruby, then the
+ package needs a dependency on "ruby". If a script uses
+ #!/usr/bin/ruby1.6, then the package need a dependency on "ruby1.6".
+ .
+ In some cases a weaker relationship, such as Suggests or Recommends, will
+ be more appropriate.
+
Tag: wrong-path-for-rc
Type: error
Info: The rc shell is installed as /usr/bin/rc on Debian systems.
Index: debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- debian/changelog (revision 285)
+++ debian/changelog (revision 286)
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@
+ [FL] Don't issue executable-not-elf-or-script for files
that are named *.exe on request of mono maintainers (Closes: #251075)
+ [CW] Add python2.4 as a valid interpreter (Closes: #254482)
+ + [FL] Add ruby1.[68] as valid interpreters, introduce new
+ ruby-script-but-no-ruby-dep error, copied from the python stuff
* checks/shared-libs:
+ [FL] Don't report shlib-with-executable-bit and
shlib-with-bad-permissions on symbolic links to such files
Reply to: