Re: Debian-Lex Rebirth? - python/perl/php?

[Lexlist <lexlist@lawyers.nl>]

I used the words 'commercial software' to not use the word 'Microsoft'  
ore 'Windows'. Windows is a good example of looking great but being  
crap. Lawyers do not know shit about software, and because of that and  
the fact they are working with classified data they need the best shit  
thinkable. There are serious liability problems for lawyers using  
windows, especially because there also is something like Debian ore  
Debian-lex. Debian-lex has to set the standard I think. Debian-lex  
needs to be safe out of the box.


Quoting Diego Zanga <naarani@gmail.com>:

> 2007/11/30, Jeroen de Kreek.nl <post@jeroendekreek.nl>:
> > Aron, If what you say is true there is no need to start working on
> > Debian Lex. There is
> > enough commercial software around for a lawyer to do the job. Whats
> > under the hood is [..]
>
> actually: have you ever worked on a free software project?
>
>
> PS
> most of the free software projects ARE commercial software
>
>
> --
> Diego Zanga
> ------------------------------
> Skype NAARANI
> http://www.javablog.eu
> http://www.elawoffice.it
> http://www.blogstudiolegale.eu
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lex-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org