On Friday, November 29, 2024 12:03:34 PM MST Daniel Hakimi wrote: > I don't think the unsigned DCO really supports the chain of custody/title > all that much, but it may still put minds at ease that the project is > following best practices regarding IP. You can certainly make an argument that the DCO isn’t *effective* at supporting the chain of custody of the end-user licensing of the code, but I think that without question that is what the *intention* of the DCO is. https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/dco -- Soren Stoutner soren@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.