[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: advice on non-free NXP Software License Agreement



Hi,

Quoting Sam Hartman (2023-06-22 16:46:51)
> >>>>> "Johannes" == Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org> writes:
> 
>     Johannes> Dear Debian legal, I seek advice on the NXP Software
>     Johannes> License Agreement and whether binaries licensed under it
>     Johannes> are redistributable in non-free(-firmware) or not. The
>     Johannes> full text is at the end of this email. I think the
>     Johannes> interesting parts are in 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3. If I'm reading
>     Johannes> this correctly, then this means that Debian is not allowed
>     Johannes> to distribute work under this license.
> 
> That's my reading as well.
> We might be able to distribute precompiled binaries under section 2.3,
> but not source, and I don't know what is involved in getting the
> permissions under 2.3 to apply.

thank you, Sam!

> In such situations we have sometimes had success reaching out to
> companies and negotiating something.

Who is usually doing this reaching out? Individual DDs like myself or official
representatives like the DPL?

The non-free binary blobs covered by this license apply to popular platforms
like the IMX8MQ (which is used by the purism librem5 phone and the mnt reform
laptop) as well as anything with a cadence edp chip like the LS2028A.

Thanks!

cheers, josch

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: