Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence

[Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org>]

Paul Jakma <paul@jakma.org> writes:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> Paul Jakma <paul@jakma.org> writes:
>>> b) They are not complying with Section 1.
>>
>> In GPLv2, section 1 allows the distribution of unmodified source code,
>> if the license information is distributed unmodified as well.
>
>> Which unmodified GPL source code do they distribute without the
>> licensing information?
>
> They are distributing files which were created outwith of Quagga,
> which explicitly refer to, make use of and rely upon facilities
> provided by GPL code obtained from Quagga (which obtained code from
> GNU Zebra before it).

This does not match section 1, which allows the distribution of
unmodified files along with the proper license information.

Again: Could you please point to the section in the GPL that is
violated?

Best regards

Ole