[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

legal implications of linking to libssl/openssl



Hello,
in transmission we received a bug[1] about excessive memory usage with our
current library (libcurl3-gnutls) which is reported fixed[2] by replacing
it with its openssl counterpart (libcurl4-openssl).

I know there were issues linking with openssl, but i dont know if it's
still accurate, so i would like to ask the list: is it ok from a legal pov
to switch from gnutls to openssl for transmission?

please CC me on replies as i'm not subscribed

thanks!

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865624
[2]
https://github.com/transmission/transmission/issues/313#issuecomment-332543087

--
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi


Reply to: