legal implications of linking to libssl/openssl
in transmission we received a bug about excessive memory usage with our
current library (libcurl3-gnutls) which is reported fixed by replacing
it with its openssl counterpart (libcurl4-openssl).
I know there were issues linking with openssl, but i dont know if it's
still accurate, so i would like to ask the list: is it ok from a legal pov
to switch from gnutls to openssl for transmission?
please CC me on replies as i'm not subscribed
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi