[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Unsure about a License with mandatory attribution clause


while packaging libml I noticed the following part in a license text:

 The end-user documentation included with the redistribution, if 
 any, must include the following acknowledgment: "This product 
 includes software developed for the Unity Project, by Mike Karlesky,
 Mark VanderVoord, and Greg Williams and other contributors", in 
 the same place and form as other third-party acknowledgments. 
 Alternately, this acknowledgment may appear in the software 
 itself, in the same form and location as other such third-party 

Now I'm a little bit unsure if this is good for distribution and building 
against in Debian, especially what is considered "end-user documentation".
Is the "end-user documentation" part satisfied by providing the license in 

Thanks for your help!

PGP-encrypted mails preferred
PGP Fingerprint: 74CD D9FE 5BCB FE0D 13EE 8EEA 61F3 4426 74DE 6624

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: