[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright in adopted package

Dear Debian Legal Team,

Thank you very much for your help.  I've read each email in this
thread with care, and at last can consider this issue closed.

On 9 June 2017 at 02:27, Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net> wrote:
> On 06/08/2017 06:52 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>> I'd prefer not to, because Message-ID reveals what I consider private
>> information (IP address or client hostname) to an unbounded audience,
>> and I believe that this is a greater privacy violation than the
>> lintian warning against downloading a hyperlinked image in local [...]
> That depends on the software that generated the message (e.g., Thunderbird
> seems to do uuid@domain, so avoids the privacy issue—at least it reveals
> less than the From header), but where it does you could just redact the
> hostname (or entire domain). That'd still preserve the ability to reference
> an individual message.
> Message-Id: <localpart@...> and
> Message-Id: <localpart@REDACTED>
> are both pretty clear what you're doing.

Anthony, thank you for this solution! :-)  I didn't know that this was allowed.
Ben, now there's a Message-ID field.  I'll upload to experimental as
soon as Sean Whitton grants me DM permissions for src:muse-el.


Reply to: