[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright in adopted package

Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com> writes:

> I pushed updates here:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/muse-el.git/tree/debian/COPYING.emails

That's a good record. Better than most Debian packages, I'd say :-)

Can you put the Message-ID field for each message in the header for the
message? That will make it easier to refer to specific messages later.

As it is, I can say I think you need only these ones:

* Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:15:58 +1000
  From: Trent Buck <trentbuck@gmail.com>

* Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 20:24:01 -0700
  From: Michael Olson <mwolson@gnu.org>

* Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 09:57:49 +0200
  From: Julien Danjou <acid@debian.org>

> How important is this updated copyright?

It's important to include explicit grant of specific license in writing
from all copyright holders.

> Do I need to worry about getting it into Stretch?

I think it can wait until after the release, though I don't speak for
the release team or FTP masters.

 \       Eccles: “I just saw the Earth through the clouds!”  Lew: “Did |
  `\      it look round?”  Eccles: “Yes, but I don't think it saw me.” |
_o__)                            —The Goon Show, _Wings Over Dagenham_ |
Ben Finney

Reply to: