Re: is igmpproxy dfsg compliant?

To: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Cc: ftpmaster@debian.org, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: is igmpproxy dfsg compliant?
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:23:06 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 201612131523.06901@pali>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201612111328.53025@pali>
References: <20090620185412.GA4958@dis.manty.net> <[🔎] 22605.17108.59033.728595@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 201612111328.53025@pali>

Anyway, what is with igmpproxy package now? I see it in new queue 
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/igmpproxy_0.1-1.html and would like to 
have it in stretch. So IIRC it needs to be uploaded before Dec 26...

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: is igmpproxy dfsg compliant?
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: is igmpproxy dfsg compliant?
  - From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: is igmpproxy dfsg compliant?
Next by Date: Fixing dvi2dvi
Previous by thread: Re: is igmpproxy dfsg compliant?
Next by thread: Re: Re: is igmpproxy dfsg compliant?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread