[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dvbackup package



Em Qua, 2016-07-06 às 16:04 -0300, Herbert Fortes escreveu:
> Em Qua, 2016-07-06 às 03:15 +0200, Cyril Brulebois escreveu:
> > Herbert Fortes <hpfn@ig.com.br> (2016-07-05):
> > > I am doing a QA for dvbackup[0]. It is an old package,
> > > but does not has a repository, so I will copy/paste.
> > > 
> > > [0] - https://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dvbackup.html
> > > 
> > > Files: logo.xcf
> > >        minilogo.ppm
> > >        minilogo.c
> > > Copyright: Larry Ewing <lewing@isc.tamu.edu>
> > > License:
> > >  Permission to use and/or modify this image is granted provided with
> > >  acknowledgement of Larry Ewing <lewing@isc.tamu.edu> and The GIMP.
> > > 
> > > Declared 'use and/or modify' only.
> > > 
> > > The files do not have an author field or something like
> > > that. You only know that Gimp was used. It is a Tux logo.
> > > 
> > > I do not think this is problem because of Gimp and the
> > > Tux logo, but shouldn't licenses be more clear and declare
> > > 'free distribution' in an explicit way ?
> > 
> > Ideally, yeah. This can be somewhat inferred from the following quote:
> > 
> > "Feel free to do whatever you see fit with the images, you are
> >  encouraged to integrate them into other designs that fit your need."
> > 
> > See: http://isc.tamu.edu/~lewing/linux/
> > 
> > See also previous thread on this very list about what “use” can mean
> > (spoiler alert: it's open to interpretation).
> 

Thanks Cyril.

I will add the link as a comment.



regards,
-- Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: