Em Qua, 2016-07-06 às 16:04 -0300, Herbert Fortes escreveu: > Em Qua, 2016-07-06 às 03:15 +0200, Cyril Brulebois escreveu: > > Herbert Fortes <hpfn@ig.com.br> (2016-07-05): > > > I am doing a QA for dvbackup[0]. It is an old package, > > > but does not has a repository, so I will copy/paste. > > > > > > [0] - https://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dvbackup.html > > > > > > Files: logo.xcf > > > minilogo.ppm > > > minilogo.c > > > Copyright: Larry Ewing <lewing@isc.tamu.edu> > > > License: > > > Permission to use and/or modify this image is granted provided with > > > acknowledgement of Larry Ewing <lewing@isc.tamu.edu> and The GIMP. > > > > > > Declared 'use and/or modify' only. > > > > > > The files do not have an author field or something like > > > that. You only know that Gimp was used. It is a Tux logo. > > > > > > I do not think this is problem because of Gimp and the > > > Tux logo, but shouldn't licenses be more clear and declare > > > 'free distribution' in an explicit way ? > > > > Ideally, yeah. This can be somewhat inferred from the following quote: > > > > "Feel free to do whatever you see fit with the images, you are > > encouraged to integrate them into other designs that fit your need." > > > > See: http://isc.tamu.edu/~lewing/linux/ > > > > See also previous thread on this very list about what “use” can mean > > (spoiler alert: it's open to interpretation). > Thanks Cyril. I will add the link as a comment. regards, -- Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part