Hello debian-legal regulars,
I would need to ask your consensus opinion on the non-freeness of the
Academic Free License ("AFL") v3.0.
My personal conclusion is that this license includes non-free
restrictions and is also problematic with respect to Debian mirror
infrastructure.
My own analysis [1][2] of the AFL v3.0 was sent to debian-legal on
September 2012 and received no rebuttal.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/09/msg00081.html
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/09/msg00082.html
I then proceeded to file the bug report against subversion, but it was
closed [3] with the request to form consensus on debian-legal (which I
think was already formed, since nobody objected to my analysis...).
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/689919#51
Could you please explicitly express your agreement with my analysis?
Thanks for any help you may provide.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpbzXTkjdedX.pgp
Description: PGP signature