[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A clarification with dual licensing

On 11/08/14 12:14, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Riley Baird wrote:
>> since releasing it under GPL-3+ would make it non-free,
> I think you mean non-distributable rather than non-free?
It's really a matter of semantics, but I would argue that since being
able to be distributed is one of the DFSG freedoms, then all
non-distributable software is non-free software

Reply to: