On 11/08/14 12:14, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Riley Baird wrote: > >> since releasing it under GPL-3+ would make it non-free, > > I think you mean non-distributable rather than non-free? > It's really a matter of semantics, but I would argue that since being able to be distributed is one of the DFSG freedoms, then all non-distributable software is non-free software