Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-05-08 21:55:45) > * Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>, 2014-05-08, 21:37: >> So if Debian provides, say, a web frontend to Ghostscript, then with >> AGPL Ghostscript running that web frontend as a service for others >> only require an interface serving its sources if the _webmaster_ >> changes the code for that frontend? >> >> Not if Debian makes changes to both the frontend and AGPL >> Ghostscript? >> >> That seems like a loophole to me: If Google wants an advantage by >> running better-than-ghostscript.google.com PDF convertor, they can >> simply let another company/organisation/person be the "Debian" in >> their chain and not need to reveal their patches to their users. > > You missed the hidden §18 (“No Loopholes Allowed”): > https://lists.debian.org/20130711174500.GA22990@redhat.com Ah, right: The difference between programming logic and law reasoning. Thanks for reminding - makes good sense. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature