On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:47PM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: > Unfortunately, Trilinos' licensing is not exactly straightforward. Alas; this happens. > Most of it is BSD-licensed, part of if LGPL, with some contributions > of other licenses mixed in; Both of those licenses sound great and compatable. Provided it's not BSD-4. > more details on > <http://trilinos.org/?page_id=143>. I've contacted Trilinos about what > parts of Trilinos are concerned by those other licenses. > > What's you guys' opinion here, specifically when it comes to > compatibility with Debian? (I could disable certain subpackages if the > licensing does not concur with Debian's policies.) https://www.debian.org/social_contract contains the DFSG, our guidelines for free software works that are fit for Debian's main archive section. Licenses must be compatable with each other or the resulting work isn't distributable. > Cheers, > Nico Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature