On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Francesco Poli <invernomuto <at> paranoici.org> writes: [...] > > > > So, is AGPLv3 still acceptable for main? > > > For the record, I personally disagree with their conclusion: > > Francesco, I specifically did *not* ask for your personal opinion > but whether it’s still acceptable for Debian main. You asked whether it's still acceptable for Debian main: I answered by describing what the FTP Masters think and what I myself think. The FTP Masters are the actual decision-makers for the Debian Project. My own opinion was just a side-note. > I even wrote in > my original message that I’m not exactly happy with AGPL either, > but you writing your personal disagreement with everyone else in > *every* *single* *thread* I happen upon on this newsgroup is, to > say it frankly, annoying. (Especially since I, who normally is the > annoying one, notices it.) You asked about the AfferoGPL and expressed your own dislike for the GPL, as a side-note. I am surprised to see that you are so annoyed by my answer, which described the official Debian position on the AfferoGPL and also my own dislike for the AfferoGPL itself, as a side-note. > Please do not take this personal, merely > as a suggestion to improve your communication behaviour (meaning, > sometimes silence is golden; since paultag already answered my > question your message had precisely zero “added value” to the thread). Paul just answered "Yes" to the main question. I thought I could add some more information. You apparently didn't appreciate it. Oh, well, that's a pity. Regards. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpRfWy3dEdOz.pgp
Description: PGP signature