Re: Which license should mercurial_keyring choose?
Christoph Mathys <email@example.com>
> Upstream has kind of dual licensed the package under GPL and BSD license
> (PKG-INFO says BSD, the implementation file mercurial_keyring.py says GPL).
> I contacted upstream and he is willing to change the license to whatever
> is required, but preferable to one of the two that have already been
> used. The idea is to avoid having to ask permission from all contributors.
> What license should I recommend to the author of the package?
If the implementation file mercurial_keyring.py says GPL for a reason
(like contributions from someone else under GPL), then GPL would be
Otherwise, if he's no problem with BSD not being share-alike, then
go for BSD (or actually BSD-like as you have to put your own name
in, because BSD is not a General licence).
Thanks for working to clarify that!
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct