On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:29:31 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 05:05:27PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: [...] > > Clearly §2 is meant to distinguish derived work from original work. > > However in our case, this means this package will have to have its > > name change whenever we need to patch the source code (eg. fix a > > compilation error). > > This appears to be entirely consistent with the requirements of DFSG #4. That's not my understanding of the issue under consideration: more details are included in my own analysis [1]. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/04/msg00007.html -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpCcqbfLop9d.pgp
Description: PGP signature