Re: libidn re-license
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@iki.fi> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> writes:
>
>> I have looked at licenses of reverse dependencies, and I did
>> found some GPLv2-only packages. That caused me to dual license
>> the package instead of going to LGPLv3+. (GPLv2-only and
>> LGPLv3+ are incompatible.) I am not aware of any other license
>> that could pose any problem with a dual-licensed GPLv2+|LGPLv3+
>> package.
>
> I believe GPLv2+|LGPLv3+ is incompatible with
> GPLv2|OpenSSL-linking-exception, used in ekg2.
Thank you for a good data point. I've brought this up with
licensing@gnu.org to hear what they have to say about it.
/Simon
Reply to: