Re: exFAT fuse driver and the patent situation
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: exFAT fuse driver and the patent situation
- From: Sven Hoexter <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 21:04:54 +0100
- Message-id: <20120102200454.GA9696@marvin>
- In-reply-to: <CAOJ6w=HdOC9bd7ARrfXVVGZmrL41h9msGZgfTxqxYoHnuYRbJw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20111230094705.GA2645@sho.bk.hosteurope.de> <CAKTje6G8-6e++n=sQKxXUv7ep0kwKJVJr4T-BzhUGbHVvQimoQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120102121823.GD6385@sho.bk.hosteurope.de> <CAOJ6w=HdOC9bd7ARrfXVVGZmrL41h9msGZgfTxqxYoHnuYRbJw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 06:40:44PM +0200, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
> If you have serious concerts, then in my opinion, you should not
> include this in Debian -or- include in "non-free" repo, and put the
> reason in the readme or changelog or package description.
While that might alert some user to do some extra checks when they're
using it, I don't think that is the correct answer. The code itself is
free and thus can be, as we stand today, distributed and altered
according to our own guidelines.
With the input I got so far, and some thoughts about it, I think it
should be included in Debian main. Arbitrary placing otherwise free
software into the non-free section doesn't win us, or our users, much
here. At least as far as I understand the situation with software
And I don't know much, but I do know this:
With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.
[ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ]