Hi, Added Sam, and I hope he doesn't mind, as I think he's the one which can give the best answer to this. On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:29:20 +0200 Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> wrote: > > DO WHATEVER THE DUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE > > Version 3, September 2011 > > Copyright (C) 2011 Felyza Wishbringer > > I think you should also acknowledge the original license text's > copyright holder with an appropriate copyright notice (Copyright (C) > 2004 Sam Hocevar <sam@hocevar.net>). Really? My reading of WTFPL is that you have to precisely remove Sam's name and put the name of who is licensing: "and changing it is allowed as long as the name is changed." License, as I read it, has no copyright for itself, which sounds pretty logical given its spirit :) regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Q: Why was Stonehenge abandoned? A: It wasn't IBM compatible.»
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature