Re: scientific paper in package only in postscript form non-free?
Paul Wise wrote:
> This seems to be the definition used by the ftp-masters, they have
> rejected packages containing PDF files that looked like they were
> generated before and this is explicitly mentioned in the REJECT-FAQ:
> Source missing: Your packages contains files that need source but do
> not have it. These include PDF and PS files in the documentation.
Indeed, but that REJECT-FAQ has not been applied to this package as
far as I can tell, maybe because it predates it. Maybe someone who
thinks those PS files should be removed should reportbug it?
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct