Hi! On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:09:39AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > Salvatore Bonaccorso asked: > > I'm in the process of preparing a NMU for autoclass [1]. During > > checking the package I encountered the two postscript files kdd-95.ps > > and tr-fia-90-12-7-01.ps . Both are awailable from [2]. > > > > Can these be shipped in the source and binary package? > > > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/614525 > > [2] http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/rse/synthesis-projects-applications/autoclass/autoclass-c/ > > They're in the upstream source tarball, so I think they're covered > by the current copyright statement > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/autoclass/current/copyright > which isn't a licence that requires original source code (like GPL > might IIRC) and arguably PS files are program source code anyway > so I think I'd ship it in both. Why do you think not? > > If we had an easier-to-use source code for the files, we should > include that, but PS is OK. > > Hope that informs, Yes that helps! Indeed I was unsure about the '... requires original source code'-part. Thanks for clarification. Bests Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature