On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 01:15:31 +0100 Ricardo Mones wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 03:32:22 +0000 > jonathon <jonathon.blake@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I wouldn't, because there are versions and localizations of the > > CC-BY-SA-NC license that are incompatible with other versions of the > > CC-BY-SA-NC license. More to the point, because of that incompatibility, > > my position is that if neither the specific localization, nor specific > > version of the CC-BY-SA-NC license are given, the the work is to be > > treated as if it was _All Rights Reserved_. > > Didn't know about localizations but was aware of the versions (hence my > attempt to find a way to fallback to something DFSG-compatible ;-) > Unfortunately this makes things even worse and therefore such theme shall > not enter main. Since the license is some version of some localized CC-by-sa-nc, I would say that this theme has no chance to enter main: as far as I know, the non-commercial (nc) license element makes it non-free (even from the "not so strict" point of view of the FTP Masters...). -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpwlLU_1OBlS.pgp
Description: PGP signature