Simon McVittie wrote: > Not that I know of; judging by putting this wording into Google, only Joey > uses it. I called it "the ikiwiki basewiki license" above, but I don't think > that's necessarily a good way to refer to it out of context. The rest of > ikiwiki is not under this license (it's mostly GPL), and the definition > of the basewiki is ikiwiki jargon. > > Joey, I don't suppose you have a name for this license? :-) I'm embarrassed enough at participating in license proliferation, to add another name too. :-p However, this is basically a heavily modified three-clause BSD license[1], so an ad-hoc term for it might be "zero-clause BSD without paranoid warantee disclaimer". Its warantee disclaimer is indeed weak. I don't know that I would want to use this on any software that could cause trouble if it broke. The files it was attached to are mostly templates that users go in and edit, and some documentation. -- see shy jo [1] http://git.ikiwiki.info/?p=ikiwiki;a=blobdiff;f=debian/copyright;h=9a57467517e896381323b574c9177f58617d7f97;hp=9b3639b35880a020f87a76b4f203da43b3589239;hb=56f8e6344c4c05656e83a47c1f7883ecc7d9808e;hpb=79751cdaf2f8a5c1017a11fedef7421e0fecf212
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature